Math 484
Ocober 4, 2007
|
x |
y |
z |
1. Solve for y,
z |
|
0 |
2 |
1 |
=u |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
=v |
2y +
z = u à z = u – 2y
x +
z = v
x +
(u-2y) = v à x = v – u +2y
Solution:
z = u – 2y
x = v – u +2y
2. x
- 2y 3 -> min,
x2
+ y 3 =
1.
Solution:
Solve
the equation for y3: y
3 =(1- x2 ).
Plug into the objective function:
x - 2(1- x2 ) = x –
2 +x2-> min.
Now
it is clear that min = -1 at x = -1, y = 0.
3.
|
x |
y |
1 |
3. Solve for x, y |
|
1 -1 |
2 1 |
x 2x |
>= 1 <= 2 |
|
-2 |
-1 |
x |
- > min |
Solution: It is given that 2y
+ 2x >= 1, x+y <=
2. The objective function, -x - y -> min.
We
take the difference the given constraints (multiply the second
constraint by 3
and then subtract it from the first) and obtain that -x-y
>=5.
Now
it is clear that min = 5 at x
= 1/2, y =3/2 .
4. Solve
the linear programs given by the following standard tableaux:
|
a |
b |
1 |
Problem 4a |
|
-1 |
0 |
-1 |
=d |
|
0 |
-1 |
-1 |
->min |
Solution: The tableau
is
feasible with column b bad, so LP is unbounded.
|
a |
b |
c |
1 |
Problem 4b |
|
-1 |
0 |
-1 |
1 |
=d |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
->min |
Solution: Tableaux is
already
optimal: min=0 at a=b=c=0, d=1
|
a |
b |
c |
1 |
Problem 4c |
|
1 |
0 |
-1 |
3 |
=d |
|
-2 |
0 |
1 |
-1 |
->min |
Solution: Tableaux is feasible with column a bad, so LP is
unbounded.
5. Find all logical
implications between the following 5
constraints
on x, y:
(a)
x3
= y3, (b) x = y= 0, (c) x >= y , (d) x + y = 0, (e)
y > -1.
Solution:
a implies c
b implies a, c, d, e