The purpose of this section is to review some well-known concepts and results from separable Banach space theory. Our focus is the weak-*topology on the dual of a separable Banach space. A reference for most of this material is Chapter V of Dunford and Schwartz [11].
Let X be a Banach space. The weak topology on X is the
weakest topology such that every bounded linear functional on X is
continuous. The dual space of X is the space X* of all
bounded linear functionals on X. The norm of
is defined by
A key theorem concerning the weak-* topology is:
Proof. See [11], page 424.
In considering weak-* sequential convergence, an important fact to keep in mind is the following consequence of the Banach-Steinhaus theorem:
Proof. See [11], page 66.
A set
is said to be weak-*sequentially closed if it is closed under weak-* limits of
sequences, i.e.,
weak-* and
for all
imply
.
For an arbitrary set
,
being weak-* sequentially
closed is not in general equivalent to being weak-* closed. In
particular, the weak-* topology is not in general metrizable, even
when X is separable. This is shown by the following theorem.
Proof. We first prove the following lemma.
Proof. For any finite set
,
is a subspace of X of codimension at most the
cardinality of F, and hence in particular it intersects
for each
.
By the Banach-Alaoglu theorem,
Bn(X*) is weak-* compact, and so
Bn(X*)n is weak-* compact
as well. Thus for each n we can find a finite set
such that, for each finite set
of
cardinality n,
intersects Gn. Letting
be an enumeration
without repetition of
,
we obtain the
desired sequence.
Proof of Theorem 2.5. Since X is
separable, it follows by Theorem 2.1 that X* is weak-*separable, so let
be a countable weak-* dense
subset of X*. By the preceding lemma, for each n we can find a
sequence
such that
for
all k and
and x*n belongs to the
weak, and hence weak-*, closure of
.
Thus
is a countable set which is weak-*dense in X*. On the other hand, for each n,
is
finite, so by Corollary 2.4 Z is weak-* sequentially
closed.
The previous theorem shows that a set in X* can be weak-*sequentially closed yet far from weak-* closed, even when X is separable. Nevertheless, it turns out that for convex sets in X*, being weak-* sequentially closed is equivalent to being weak-* closed, provided X is separable. We shall obtain this result as a consequence of the following well-known theorem:
Proof. See [11], page 429.
The special case of the Krein-Smulian theorem for subspaces of X* is originally due to Banach ([2] page 124):
Proof. For a subspace Z of X*, we have
.
Hence
is weak-* closed for all r if
and only if
is weak-* closed. The desired result
follows immediately from the Krein-Smulian theorem.
A set Z in X* is said to be bounded-weak-* closed if
is weak-*-closed for all r>0. This defines yet
another topology on X*, the bounded-weak-* topology. By
the Banach-Alaoglu theorem, weak-* closed sets are bounded-weak-*closed, but the converse does not hold in general. We can paraphrase
the Krein-Smulian theorem by saying that a convex set in X* is
weak-* closed if and only if it is bounded-weak-* closed.
Proof. By definition, Z is bounded-weak-* closed if and only if
is weak-* closed for all r. Since X is separable, we
have by Theorem 2.1 that Br(X*) is weak-* compact and
weak-* metrizable. Hence, for all r,
is weak-*closed if and only if
is weak-* sequentially
closed. By Corollary 2.4 it now follows that
is weak-* closed for all r if and only if Z is
weak-* sequentially closed. This completes the proof.
We now obtain the desired result:
Proof. Immediate from Theorem 2.7 plus Lemma 2.9.
Again, the special case when Z is a subspace of X* is due to Banach ([2] page 124):
We now turn to a discussion of weak-* sequential closure ordinals.
For an arbitrary set
,
let Z' denote the set of
weak-* limits of sequences from Z. Define a transfinite sequence
of sets
,
an ordinal, by
In the remainder of this section and the next section, we shall prove some results which completely answer the question of which ordinals can arise as closure ordinals of subspaces of X* where X is a separable Banach space. This question was first answered completely by McGehee [18] and Sarason [19,20,21].
Proof. For r>0 and
an ordinal, let
be the weak-*closure of
.
For fixed r>0, the sets
form an increasing, transfinite sequence of compact
subsets of a compact metric space, namely Br(X*) with the weak-*topology (Theorem 2.1). This transfinite sequence must
therefore stabilize at some countable ordinal. Since
for
all
,
it follows that the transfinite sequence
also stabilizes at a countable ordinal,
call it
.
Put
.
Then
is a countable ordinal. We claim that
is
weak-* sequentially closed. To see this, suppose that x* is the
weak-* limit of a sequence
from
.
By Corollary 2.3, there exists
such that
for all
.
Hence
,
so in
particular
and our claim is proved. Thus
,
i.e.,
is countable.
Specializing to subspaces of X*, we can say more:
Proof. By the previous lemma,
is
countable. Suppose that
,
for some countable limit ordinal
.
As
is norm closed, this implies that
,
where
denotes
the norm closure of
.
Thus
is a closed
subset of a complete metric space, written as a countable union of
closed sets. By the Baire category theorem, there must be an ordinal
such that
has non-void interior as a
subset of
,
i.e.,
contains the
intersection of an open (in norm) ball with
.
But
is a subspace of
,
so it must be all of
.
Since
,
it
follows that
,
whence
.
We
have now shown that
is not a limit ordinal. Thus
must be either 0 or a successor ordinal. If
then Z is
weak-* sequentially closed, and hence is weak-* closed by
Corollary 2.11. This completes the proof. See also
Kechris and Louveau [14], page 157.
It is known that the converse of the previous theorem also holds: For
every countable successor ordinal
,
we can find a subspace
Z of the dual X* of a separable Banach space X such that
.
In the next section we present a
proof of this result, with
and Z weak-*dense in
.
The study of closure ordinals of subspaces of X* has an interesting
history. Von Neumann ([24] page 380) exhibits a set
such that 0 is in the weak closure of S yet no
sequence from S converges weakly to 0. The first example of a
subspace Z of X* such that
is due to Mazurkiewicz
[17]. Banach ([2] pages 209-213) proves
that for every
there is a subspace Z of
such
that
and states the analogous result for all countable
ordinals. For the proof Banach refers to a ``forthcoming'' paper
which seems never to have appeared, and this reference is omitted from
the English translation [1]. Later, McGehee
[18] proves the stronger result that for each countable
ordinal
there exists a weak-* dense subspace of
whose closure ordinal is exactly
(but note
that McGehee's notation differs from ours). In the next section we
reprove this result of McGehee. Sarason
[19,20,21] proves a similar result for the
spaces
and
.
In view of the theorem above,
these results of McGehee and Sarason are in a sense best possible.
While McGehee's proof uses sets of synthesis and uniqueness, our proof
in the next section is much more elementary.